gpio: s5p: increment bank base address only if bank is initialized

There is a condition guard which ensures that the GPIO node, indeed
describes a GPIO controller.

	if (!fdtdec_get_bool(blob, node, "gpio-controller"))
		continue;

Since the bank base is being incremented in the loop, it is done so
irrespective of whether the node is a GPIO controller or not. This leads
to the incorrect resolution of bank base addresses.

Move it out of the loop, and instead increment the bank base address
only if the driver successfully binds a GPIO controller.

Reviewed-by: Henrik Grimler <henrik@grimler.se>
Fixes: b8809e60cd ("dm: exynos: gpio: Convert to driver model")
Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@disroot.org>
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kaustabh Chakraborty
2025-10-21 19:51:35 +05:30
committed by Minkyu Kang
parent 1ca7bcdb9d
commit 4937a9778c

View File

@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int gpio_exynos_bind(struct udevice *parent)
base = dev_read_addr_ptr(parent);
for (node = fdt_first_subnode(blob, dev_of_offset(parent)), bank = base;
node > 0;
node = fdt_next_subnode(blob, node), bank++) {
node = fdt_next_subnode(blob, node)) {
struct exynos_gpio_plat *plat;
struct udevice *dev;
fdt_addr_t reg;
@@ -341,9 +341,8 @@ static int gpio_exynos_bind(struct udevice *parent)
if (reg != FDT_ADDR_T_NONE)
bank = (struct s5p_gpio_bank *)((ulong)base + reg);
plat->bank = bank;
debug("dev at %p: %s\n", bank, plat->bank_name);
plat->bank = bank++;
}
return 0;